Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have
. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of
until the payment is fully completed, and Ekkamon to pay 333,333.33 baht. Both monetary penalties shall be submitted as state revenue. On 26 May 2020, the Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment of the
Technology |- Business Continuity Management (BCM) |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public Holidays (Section 110) | - |- Segregation of Finance and Securities Business & Merger (Section 90
) | - |- Representatives Offices Establishment (Section 93) |- Complaint Handling |- Anti-money Laundering |- Information Technology |- Business Continuity Management (BCM) |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public
|- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public Holidays (Section 110) | - |- Segregation of Finance and Securities Business & Merger (Section 90) | - |- Related Organizations with Securities Business (Section 230
violation of Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. On October 7, 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the defendant to 10 years in prison. The defendant exercised the right to appeal. The
) Securities Financing (section 4) Separation of Securities and Finance Businesses & Merger (section 90) Representatives Office of foreign securities companies (section 93) Holidays (section 110) Securities