Earlier, the Civil Sanction Consideration Committee resolved to apply civil sanctions on Mr. Suphanan, an IFEC director and chief executive officer, and Mr. Thanawat Chansuwan, who was IFEC director and executive at the time of the offence, on the ground of insider trading. They were ordered to pay civil fines and return any gains from the offence.*Mr. Suphanan, however, sent a letter asking to postpone the acknowledgment and the agreement to pay the civil fine by 30 days (to 3 October 201...

Earlier, the Civil Penalty Consideration Committee resolved to apply civil sanctions against Mr. A for obstructing and failing to set up a board of directors meeting and a shareholders meeting to appoint new directors to fill vacancies while serving as IFEC director and chief executive officer. In addition, the SEC investigation found that Mr. A disobeyed the board of directors’ instruction and refused to cooperate with other IFEC directors to facilitate the board of directors’ meeting by...

Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee resolved to impose civil sanctions on Mr. Thanawat, who was IFEC director and executive at the time of the offence. He was ordered to pay a civil fine and return any gains from the wrongdoings.* Mr. Thanawat came in to acknowledge the civil sanctions, but did not consent to comply with the punishment terms within the specified time. The SEC has therefore requested the public prosecutor in writing to file a lawsuit against Mr. Thanawat in the Civil C...

4. A notifications of allegation, appointment, imposition of administrative sanction, consideration on appeal or any other matters shall be made in writing. Clause 5. In cases of urgency or where a

that he did not have any evidence for now. The accusation on SCIB-C1 case is only his assumption based on his observation from securities trading information publicly accessed. Mr. Thirachai

and has B490 million overdue tax;? DEVA is at risk of allegation by the Assets Examination Committee (AEC) and claim for damages by the National Housing Authority for the delay of delivery of Baan Aur

subject to the complaint is entitled to defend the allegation accordingly. _____________________Information contained in this news release is as of the aforementioned release date. For those who wish to

conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. However, Apichart and Ratchanee denied the allegation while Krisda did not make any contact to clarify his action. As for Preecha, there is no evidence to identify

DSI for its consideration to take further legal action. The allegation shows that the accused are considered to be untrustworthy to perform duties as directors and executives of a securities issuing

overdue tax. Besides, DEVA is currently at risk of allegation by the Assets Examination Committee (AEC) and claim for damages by the National Housing Authority for the delay of delivery of Baan Aur-Arthorn