adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, and Section 66 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant’s act constituted
order or an action which results in the offence that the company operated digital asset exchange businesses without a license. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section
order or an action which results in the offence that the company offered digital tokens to the public without an approval from the SEC Office. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty
filed. The court has ordered that the lawsuits be adjudicated on the examination date. Debtors in the court case of the North Bangkok The confession was made throughout the allegations and will repay the
the court .……….., case pending adjudication No. .……/25.. and adjudicated case No..……/25.. between.……………. and………………………………… for an offence of ……………………………………..…….. Punishment inflicted
offence: O yes (please specify in detail) O the final judgement of the court .……….., case pending adjudication No. .……/25.. and adjudicated case No..……/25.. between.……………. and………………………………… for an offence of
the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535(1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The DSI and public prosecutors probed into the case and decided to pursue charges against them
FOCUS share price. Her jail term, however, was suspended for two years.Yesterday (October 31, 2012), the Criminal Court ruled against two share price manipulators for violating Section 243(1), (2) in