, on 15 March 2018, the Civil Court made a decision to void the resolution of the annual general shareholders? meeting held on 2 May 2017, which has consequently resulted in the cancellation of Mr
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
) Enter into Network Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to
Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA