violation of Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. On October 7, 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the defendant to 10 years in prison. The defendant exercised the right to appeal. The

Clause 3. Law on administrative procedure shall, mutatis mutandis, be applicable to a consideration and imposition of administrative sanction and consideration on an appeal against such imposition. Clause

representatives (Section 18) |- Auditors | - |- Approval (Section 30) |- Accounting and Financial Statements (Section 27, 28) |- Reporting Requirements |- Anti-money Laundering |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others

, Act BE 2535. As a result, IFEC has been delayed in resolving the problem and cannot return to normal business operations. 28/10/2021 The Civil Court delivered the Appeal Court judgment amending the

cause the price or the volume of such securities trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition and caused damages to other investors. 15/12/2020 The Civil Court delivered the Appeal Court

, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court dismissed the case. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an

The Royal Ceramic Industry PLC (RCI) by arranging trading accounts of other persons for Mr. Sagha, sending manipulative trading orders, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court

Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank

Mr. Krit Proicharoen Mr. Krit Proicharoen aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA The Appeal

Mr. Charoemchai Chuppa Mr. Charoemchai Chuppa aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal