mobile market. On the cost side, there’s less marketing spending QoQ and lower tower & equipment rental from settling disputes with TOT. As a result, reported EBITDA was Bt21,135mn increasing 19% YoY and
Protection for Subscribers upon the Expiration of Concession Agreements or the Agreement to Operate B.E. 2013. and (2) the Arbitral Tribunal ordering TRUE to pay TOT Public Company Limited (“TOT”) penalty for
license is expected to commence around 4Q20. 3. In 3Q19, AIS entered into two settlements with TOT on tower dispute and equipment rental. Effectively, net cost of tower rental was reduced by Bt100mn per
mining property rights over the two mines truly exist, (2) report the re-assessment results of the fair value of the mining property rights, and (3) disclose all clarifications via the SET Information
construction projects, despite the fact that the services did not exist, with intent to deceive other persons. The said action was in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992
that the applicant had transferred all shares of such company to a third party despite various factors indicating that the transaction may not exist. This would lead to incorrect and incomplete
to (1) clarify whether the mining property rights over the two mines truly exist, (2) report the re-assessment results of the fair value of the mining property rights, and (3) disclose all
, inclusive of CSL’s revenue and equipment rental from partnership with TOT (see significant event). Excluding IC and equipment rental, service revenue would have been +5.7% YoY and +1.6% QoQ, against the FY18
%YoY and -1.3%QoQ continued impact from COVID-19 pandemic and market competition. Core service revenue (excluding IC and TOT partnership) was Bt32,130mn, decreasing -6.8YoY and flat QoQ from the decline