Bangkok, September 16, 2008 ? Following the Stock Exchange of Thailand?s steep fall today due to investors? concerns over troubled US financial industry, the SEC would like to inform that the failure of US financial institutions has not directly affected Thai business. Meanwhile, the SEC and relevant authorities have been working closely together to monitor the situation and potential impacts on listed companies and securities firms.SEC Deputy Secretary-General Prasong Vinaiphat said: ?US invest...
about saving and investment. Commercial banks and the TBAC are therefore pleased to be part of this important campaign and would like to confirm our commitment to further help promote sound financial
; asset systems that could not segregate the customers' assets from Satang's without doubt. DAB Act S.31 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 12/2022 Settlement Committee Order No. 20/2022 Dated 07
of Zipmex’s customers that were deposited to earn returns in Thailand in a way that Zipmex, without doubt, could not segregate digital assets of the customers and may use such digital assets for any
effective system for protecting the client?s asset that are (1) failing to segregate assets under its custody as assets of clients in accordance with the notification and (2) investing assets of clients in
The Derivatives Act The Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 SECTION 33. A derivatives business operator shall segregate the customer asset from its own, and shall prepare and keep account of customer asset for
notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board by failing to put in place a sufficient and effective system for protecting the client’s asset that is failing to segregate assets under its custody as assets
Zipmex’s customers that were deposited to earn returns in Thailand in a way that Zipmex, without doubt, could not segregate digital assets of the customers and may use such digital assets for any other
segregate assets under its custody as assets of clients in accordance with the notification and (2) investing assets of clients in private company bond which violated section 98(3) of the Securities and