Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee decided to impose civil sanctions on Mr. Surin Banyongponglert in the case where he had sent trading orders of PICO shares in the manner of price manipulation. However, Surin did not agree to comply with the civil sanctions. Later, on 26 December 2018, the public prosecutor filed a lawsuit against Surin with the Civil Court, as requested by SEC, in order for the Court to impose the civil sanctions on Surin in the Black Case No. Por. 7563/2561 between S...

The Civil Sanction Committee decided to impose a civil sanction on Mr. Suphanan Rittiphairoj, IFEC director and executive at the time of the offense, in the case where he had used inside information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27 December 2018, the public prosecutor filed a lawsuit against Suphanan with the Civil Court in the Blac...

SEC has received a tip from an investor that a Facebook account named “Japhoon” (meaning Catching Stocks) may operate business without obtaining a license from SEC. After further investigation of evidence, SEC has found that Artit gave investment advice and solicited the general public to invest in securities and derivatives. In so doing, he used the Japhoon Facebook account as an advertising channel for learning courses on securities and derivatives investment and also used a Line group as a ch...

severe damage or a negative impact on public interest, or when a chance to clarify cannot be given to the alleged offender per se. If the gathered evidence presents a sufficient ground for enforcement, the

in any  particular case. If an offender fails to pay a civil penalty, in full or in part despite already agreed upon, or refuses to comply with a civil sanction, the SEC may seek the Civil Court's

the consideration of withdrawal cause in the event that listed company has financial problems or fails to comply with the regulations and thus generate severe impact, for example, the shareholders

the company. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial

., Ltd. in 2004. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial

the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the public prosecutor cannot bring the alleged offender to trial. DV Act

Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). - The SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender together with the others. The inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint