mobile market. On the cost side, there’s less marketing spending QoQ and lower tower & equipment rental from settling disputes with TOT. As a result, reported EBITDA was Bt21,135mn increasing 19% YoY and
Protection for Subscribers upon the Expiration of Concession Agreements or the Agreement to Operate B.E. 2013. and (2) the Arbitral Tribunal ordering TRUE to pay TOT Public Company Limited (“TOT”) penalty for
license is expected to commence around 4Q20. 3. In 3Q19, AIS entered into two settlements with TOT on tower dispute and equipment rental. Effectively, net cost of tower rental was reduced by Bt100mn per
, inclusive of CSL’s revenue and equipment rental from partnership with TOT (see significant event). Excluding IC and equipment rental, service revenue would have been +5.7% YoY and +1.6% QoQ, against the FY18
%YoY and -1.3%QoQ continued impact from COVID-19 pandemic and market competition. Core service revenue (excluding IC and TOT partnership) was Bt32,130mn, decreasing -6.8YoY and flat QoQ from the decline
revenue”, grew 5.4%YoY from the demand for EDS and Cloud. Network OPEX excluding cost of TOT partnership was +9.4% increase YoY, as the base rental and utilities increased from 4G/5G network expansion
enterprise market in the medium term. Cost management has resulted in profitability improvement. Excluding payment to TOT, cash cost of service and SG&A continued to be stabilized, -4.8% YoY and +2.2% QoQ, due
, including the consolidation of CSL, equipment rental from TOT partnership, and sales revenue. Core service revenue (excluding IC & equipment rental) was Bt99,745mn, increasing 3.9% YoY, and reflected timid
network and service. This resulted in overall network OPEX ( excluding cost of TOT partnership) to stay flat YoY or remained at 8% of core service revenue. The focus on effective spending amidst intense