Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee decided to impose civil sanctions on Mr. Surin Banyongponglert in the case where he had sent trading orders of PICO shares in the manner of price manipulation

information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27

The SEC has sought cooperation from all financial advisors (FA) to help raise up standards of IPO companies by focusing on good internal control system and credibility of financial statements

servicing clients who want to reclaim their assets and will lay off all employees,SEC found out that clients’ digital assets which remained under control or in possession of BX were transferred thereafter

comply with the SET?s regulations and the SET has already ordered the imposed penalty. This SEC?s administrative sanction is in accordance with the SET?s orders

such sanction; however, they refused to pay the civil penalty. Consequently, the SEC forwarded the case for the public attorney to bring a further legal action in the Civil Court. In this regard, a

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a penalty fine of 80,995,415.67 baht on him.In this regard, the SEC appreciated cooperation and assistance

Bangkok, August 21, 2012 ? The SEC revealed that the Settlement Committee has imposed a fine of 500,000 baht on Sunthorn Chaononghin, then an engineer of Solartron PLC (SOLAR), for trading SOLAR

impose civil sanction on the eight offenders. In this regard, (1) PCL, (2) Pranay, (3) Manish and (5) Amit were ordered to pay a separate civil penalty of 500,000 baht while (4) PAPL was ordered to pay

Sanction Committee has resolved for the SEC to impose civil sanction on the seven offenders in the form of civil penalty, which was considered based on the benefit received by each offender. Porameth signed