rendered a judgement in the Red Case No. Por. 5396/2562, wherein the defendant was required to pay (1) a civil penalty, 1.25 times the benefits that the defendant received or would have received from

information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27

offences regarding  market misconduct, and introducing civil penalty as an alternative sanction. Assistant Secretary-General Sakkarin Ruamrangsri said: ?The nature of market misconduct has become more

in this manner had not happened before. The fact in this matter, although seems not so complicated, relates to many provisions of laws under the purview of both the SEC and the DBD. Accordingly, while

material information which has not yet been disclosed to the public. 01/04/2020 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :    

's profit. 12/05/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht

agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht SEC Act (before the fifth

using material non- public information for Mr.Suwat's profit. 12/06/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :    

>20/07/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.30 Baht SEC Act

permissible products are more complicated, risky and similar to those AIs have been allowed to invest domestically such as unrated bond and foreign sukuk. Moreover, all investors will have more investment