rendered a judgement in the Red Case No. Por. 5396/2562, wherein the defendant was required to pay (1) a civil penalty, 1.25 times the benefits that the defendant received or would have received from

information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27

's profit. 12/05/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht

agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht SEC Act (before the fifth

using material non- public information for Mr.Suwat's profit. 12/06/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :    

>20/07/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.30 Baht SEC Act

material information which has not yet been disclosed to the public. 01/04/2020 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :    

enforced by banks, brokers, etc. • Governance by code, not by people – Nobody to hold accountable – Code is not always well-written – Velocity of transactions is very high, e.g., “flash loans” • Reliance on

. Sittilarp to conceal the identity of the account user. 08/07/2022 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil

results showed the net earnings of 14.25 million Baht, which was a significant increase compared to the Q3/2014. 15/09/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty