Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have

. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of

until the payment is fully completed, and Ekkamon to pay 333,333.33 baht. Both monetary penalties shall be submitted as state revenue. On 26 May 2020, the Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment of the

to consultation papers and more convenient participation in the hearing process. The website is accessible via multiple devices such as desktop, tablet and mobile phone, to fit the users

million or 177% when compared with the same quarter of last year. This was resulting from an exclusive mobile phone project, a new project in the third quarter of 2018, recorded sales in this quarter of

the businesses in subsidiaries and associated the Company investing had improved operating results when compared to the same period last year. The business of mobile phone distribution business

Holding Company investing in retail business such as mobile phone distribution and accessories, non-performing debt management, real estate development, hire purchase (associated company), personal loan

a number of orders via mobile phone. For {B}, the SEC probed into the case and found that she failed to keep complete record of a number of a client's securities trading orders and admitted that the

had received the trading orders from the client's authorized person via mobile phone. The SEC further probed into the case and found communication record between {A} and the client's authorized person

order form (Form F8) despite the fact that those trading orders were made via mobile phone. Use of Form F8 therefore was inappropriate submission of trading orders because such Form must be used in