their misconduct in this case, SEC views that {A} and {B} both failed to perform duties or giving services with loyalty.* SEC has therefore suspended the approval as investment consultant for complex

coverage lapsed.  Chalermwut’s wrongful acts against investors’ assets were liable to failure to perform duties or provide services with loyalty in accordance with the Notification of the Capital Market

perform duties or provide services with loyalty by committing wrongdoing against investor assets. Both cases constitute prohibited characteristics for personnel in the capital market business under the

their profession duties with loyalty* by making unauthorized investment without client’s permission, and order or consent on making fake documents. While {B} failed to properly discharge his

act caused by an external factor, {A}’s submission of false documents to the bank in order to help the client was deemed a failure to perform duties or provide services with loyalty pursuant to the

services with loyalty* by concealing, hiding and fabricating false evidence, and therefore revoked the approval and will not accept her future application for approval as personnel in the capital market

damage at the amount of 20,000 baht.   SEC has considered that Sorrapon failed to perform duties with loyalty* by committing wrongful acts against the investor’s asset, which was deemed a prohibited

or provide services with loyalty* by concealing, hiding and fabricating false evidence, and therefore revoked the approval and will not accept her future application for approval as personnel in the

provide services with loyalty* by committing wrongful acts against investors’ assets, which was an offense liable to revocation of approval as investment consultant. However, the approval as securities

affected client.  Nuchanart’s demeanors above were wrongful acts against investors, which were deemed failure to perform duties or give services with loyalty in accordance with the Notification of the