their profession duties with loyalty* by making unauthorized investment without client’s permission, and order or consent on making fake documents. While {B} failed to properly discharge his

their misconduct in this case, SEC views that {A} and {B} both failed to perform duties or giving services with loyalty.* SEC has therefore suspended the approval as investment consultant for complex

coverage lapsed.  Chalermwut’s wrongful acts against investors’ assets were liable to failure to perform duties or provide services with loyalty in accordance with the Notification of the Capital Market

providing services to clients with loyalty while applying knowledge and skills with discretion as professional. In the case of SKFM, SEC ordered the company, a small-sized asset management company whose

.{A} case was referred from the Stock Exchange of Thailand for the SEC's further investigation while cases of {B} and {C} were detected by the SEC's routine inspection. The SEC found from the probe that

trading orders, effective from January 19, 2013.The SEC found from its routine inspection that {A} had failed to record her investment advice and a client's securities trading orders for 14 days as

. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under

authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation

suspending {A}, an employee of Kiatnakin Securities Co., Ltd. and {B}, an employee of Phara Securities Plc. and also revealing {C}'s inappropriate behavior.  The SEC found from its routine inspection that {A

from its routine inspection in Asia Plus Securities Plc., that {B} had been authorized by his client to make securities trading decisions on the client's behalf. The communication records showed that {B