to directors of BBGI and its subsidiaries are based on a par value of THB10 per share. However, the allocated number of new ordinary shares indicted in the table may vary, depending on the par value of
sanctions under Section 125. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. DV Act
sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 60,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day for 279 days starting from April 1,2010 until January 4,2021 totally 279,000 Baht. The amount of total fine for the
financial statements for Q1/2019 to the SEC within the specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 60,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day for 279 days starting
, violating Section 301. On February 9, 2011, the court sentenced the accused to one-year imprisonment. The accused appealed against the judgment of the Court. SEC Act S.301 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
2019, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 40,000 and a further fine of Baht 200 each day for 859 days starting from June 1,2022 until October 7,2022 totally 171,800 Baht. The
for the year 2012 (Form 56-1) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. On March 26, 2014, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56 and Section 274
") against Theeratchanon, Supaporn, and the above eight others, who were authorized to act for gas bottling plants, for the above misconducts. The prosecutor had charged the two accused and juristic persons
public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244
accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed