permit another to produce fraud documents and prepare incorrect financial statements to deceive other persons. the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the accused
fraud documents and prepare incorrect financial statements to deceive other persons. the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the accused failed and the statute of
documents and prepare incorrect financial statements to deceive other persons. the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the accused failed and the statute of limitations
CIRKIT to commit or permit another to produce fraud documents and prepare incorrect financial statements to deceive other persons. the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to
PICNI containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The Appeal Court overturned the
containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the
, defrauded and embezzled the company’s money by falsifying purchasing documents of non-existent cars to deceive the company into paying the money to himself and other persons for those cars, thereby causing
materially lower than the actual value to deceive any persons about financial condition and performance of the company. The said entries were found in the financial statements: Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and
lower than the actual value to deceive any persons about financial condition and performance of the company. The said entries were found in the financial statements: Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and year
, colluded with other directors and executives of STARK, or consented to the falsification of STARK and its subsidiaries’ financial statements from 2021 - 2022 to deceive the public. Mr. Prakorn had a duty to