finance director, in seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of advertising billboards. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.281/2
follows: 1. Misappropriating money through loan transactions for V Billboard Company Limited (VBB). 2. Seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of advertising Billboards. 3. Seeking
. Misappropriating money through loan transactions for V Billboard Company Limited (VBB). 2. Seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of advertising Billboards. 3. Seeking improper gains from land
. Misappropriating money through loan transactions for V Billboard Company Limited (VBB). 2. Seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of advertising Billboards. 3. Seeking improper gains from land
director, in many circumstances, as follows: 1. Misappropriating money through loan transactions for V Billboard Company Limited (VBB). 2. Seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of
finance director, in many circumstances, as follows: 1. Misappropriating money through loan transactions for V Billboard Company Limited (VBB). 2. Seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of
and buy-back of advertising billboards. 3. Seeking improper gains from land purchase. 4. Misappropriating TRITN’s money through transactions with VBB for securing locations for the billboards. The
in absolute receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup
Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid
receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Charuwan, who were his debtors. Later Miss