annual interest rate of 7.5 percent of the said principal, as from the case filing date (26 December 2018) until the date of completing the total payment to the plaintiff. In addition, the defendant was

. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of

2019, the Civil Court passed a judgment in the Decided Case No. Por. 899/2562 ordering Surasak to pay 522,500 baht and a 7.5 percent annual interest of 22,500 baht, starting from the case filing date

violation of Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. On October 7, 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the defendant to 10 years in prison. The defendant exercised the right to appeal. The

PowerPoint Presentation Procedure for Administrative Action and Appeal Filing Taking legal action(s) Administrative Action Civil Sanction Criminal Action Considering whether to constitute law

Clause 3. Law on administrative procedure shall, mutatis mutandis, be applicable to a consideration and imposition of administrative sanction and consideration on an appeal against such imposition. Clause

Court of First Instance The Appeal Court The Supreme Court These offenses (e.g. presenting false statement concerning public offering, analyzing financial position based on false information, using or

representatives (Section 18) |- Auditors | - |- Approval (Section 30) |- Accounting and Financial Statements (Section 27, 28) |- Reporting Requirements |- Anti-money Laundering |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others

, Act BE 2535. As a result, IFEC has been delayed in resolving the problem and cannot return to normal business operations. 28/10/2021 The Civil Court delivered the Appeal Court judgment amending the

, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court dismissed the case. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an