but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed derivatives business. This case is under consideration of the public
Financial (NZ) Ltd. had been registered with the SEC as derivatives dealer but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed
, contravening Section 343 of the Penal Code. On September 27, 2017, The Supreme Court ruled that the accused operated unlicensed securities business in the name of BENSON DUPONT in violating section 90 of SEA and
committing unlicensed digital asset exchange offense. On March 7, 2024, the Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 3, 26 and 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E