), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. DV Act S.Section 16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 16/08/2017
for Q2/ 2015, and (3) the reviewed financial statements for Q3/2015 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Criminal Court ordered the defendant to pay a fine of Baht 522,000 and a
period. The Criminal Court ordered the defendant to pay a fine of Baht 80,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 for each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies for
reviewed financial statements for Q1-Q3/2015 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Criminal Court ordered the defendant to pay a fine of Baht 522,000 and a further fine of Baht 500 for each
and submit the reviewed financial statements for Q2-Q3/2017 within the period specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board. On July 2, 2020, The Criminal Court ordered the defendant to pay a fine
position as a chief executive officer of TUCC. Mr. Yongyuth failed to pay fines as ordered by the Settlement Committee, the SEC therefore filed a criminal complaint against him with the DSI for further legal
million loss in Q2/2011. Miss Vorapin gained such material non-public information by virtue of her position as a chief finance officer of TUCC. Miss Vorapin failed to pay fines as ordered by the Settlement
shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. He entered the settlement process but failed to pay the fine as ordered by Settlement Committee. The public
shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. He entered the settlement process but failed to pay the fine as ordered by Settlement Committee. The public
reviewed financial statements for Q2/2014 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Criminal Court ordered the defendant to pay a fine of Baht 60,000 and a further fine of Baht 500 for each and