of Agripure Holdings Public Company Limited (“APURE”) which caused their aggregated holding of APURE shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of APURE. However, the

Agripure Holdings Public Company Limited (“APURE”) which caused their aggregated holding of APURE shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of APURE. However, the offerors

shares of Agripure Holdings Public Company Limited (“APURE”) which caused their aggregated holding of APURE shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of APURE. However, the

shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of JAS. However, Mr. Pete failed to comply with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of

in TAPAC shares to exceed trigger point at 25 percent of the total number of voting rights of TAPAC, but Mr. Surachai failed to comply with tender offer rules specified by the Capital Market

his aggregate shareholding in SVI shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total number of voting rights of SVI, but Mr. Pongsak failed to prepare and submit (1) a report of the acquisition

voting rights of JAS which caused his aggregated holdings of JAS shares to exceed 50 percent. The amount of his holdings of JAS was a significant degree of control of JTS. However, Mr. Pete failed to

complaint must not exceed 27,175.50 Baht according to the request of the claimant. Moreover, the court ordered Mr. Thanawat to reimburse the execution cost and 6,000 Baht of attorney fee to the claimant.