2014 to the second quarter of 2016 of five EY clients which were listed companies to purchase securities of such companies while the clients’ draft financial statements were being recorded into the EY
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
Mr. Mitsuji Konoshita Mr. Konoshita ordered Group Lease Holding Co., Ltd. (GLH), a subsidiary of GL based in Singapore, to issue loans to several foreign companies. Evidence showed that GLH had
and entered into derivatives contracts whose underlyings were the securities price of such companies while the companies’ draft financial statements were being recorded in the EY information system
and receive allocated shares for patrons of such companies. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.311, Section 315 and Section 89/7 in conjunction