out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT contacted the Company to request time for
out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT contacted the Company to request time for
January 25, 2017, the Legal Department sent out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT
รายการเอกสารแนบท่ีต้องยื่นผ่านระบบเพื่อประกอบการพิจารณา นิติบุคคลต่างประเทศ 1. Power of Attorney 2. Notary Public กรณีนิติบุคคลต่างประเทศท่ีไม่สามารถส่งเอกสาร Power of Attorney และ/หรือ Notary Public
plaintiff's cost and attorney fees of THB 10,000, instead of the plaintiff. At present, the court has issued a enforcement order to prepare for seizure following the procedure. 1.2 Muse Group Bangkok Company
September 2017) until the settlement to the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff's cost and attorney fees of THB 10,000, instead of the plaintiff. Indeed, the court has already issued the
products : 1. Salesman of a Broker Dealer and/or Investment House 2. Certified Investment Solicitor (salesman for shares or units of Investment Companies) 3. Key officer/s of Fund Managers (Investment
fine? The SEC Office institute a criminal prosecution by filing a complaint. Department of Special Investigation (DSI) Office of Attorney-General Considering whether to bring a prosecution or not? The
: ...................................................... (…………………………………………….) Authorized person Date: ......................................... Remarks: 1. In case of authorization for submission of documents, a power of attorney is required. 2. In case of a juristic person, the
responding and counterclaiming for damages in the amount by Baht 106. 3 million, including the interest, on the ground of the breach of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the