-mail : oca@sec.or.th Root cause analysis Activities for enhancing audit quality Suggestions on how to improve audit quality Executive summary Contents Quality Assurance Review Panel (“QARP”) Significant
information, technical knowledge, and experience in audit oversight as well as to improve cooperation between and ensure consistency among audit regulators. This supports the ASEAN capital market linkage plan
emphasis on, and strive to improve, the quality control in every element on a continued basis. This will help to promote audit quality and build trustworthiness of the financial reporting system of the Thai
Phusitphoykai 04 Activities for Enhancing Audit Quality In our continued efforts to improve the quality of financial reporting of the listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), the SEC, in
stakeholders in discharging their duties to the fullest capacity and improve the quality of financial reporting of entities in the capital market. Aside from the aforementioned efforts and developments, the SEC
significantly increased thanks to the audit firms’ devoted allocation of resources to develop quality control system, enhance quality of human resources, and invest in audit supporting technology to improve both
will simultaneously improve the other elements’ effectiveness. Determined to solidify financial reporting and audit quality, the SEC aims to strengthen all elements of TSQC1 and has, therefore, raised
............................................................ B. Engagement Level ............................................... Root cause analysis and examples of action plans to improve the quality control system .................. Our Focus for the Third
for review. We also roll out various projects to support the quality development from within the firms, e.g., workshops on in-depth analysis of the root causes of deficiencies and how to improve the
2. * KPMG 2564 Big 4 (partner) 23 24 4 4 * / professional skepticism 11 3. * KPMG 2563 - 2564 Big 4 15.60% 20.31% * / AQIs 4. * KPMG 2564 Big 4 (staff/ partner ratio) 17 : 1 25 : 1 (staff/ manager