decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO. Such actions misled DAIDO’s shareholders or any
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO. Such actions misled DAIDO’s shareholders or any
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. in order to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO, thereby misleading DAIDO’s shareholders or
show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the
statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
scrap. This resulted in AMAC’s 2008 and 2009 financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to
statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and