paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the
Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the
had committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the punishment prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) for being a director who acted to obtain falsified accounts or
such a way as to take advantage of other persons by using adverse material non-public information concerning LVT net loss in Q1/2010 of 37.65 million baht which was significantly different from LVT net
different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the
handle suitable portfolios for investors through different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated
experienced experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3
experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In
as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been
which was significantly different from LVT net profit in the last three years. On July 19, 2017, the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 241 and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with