January 19, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the parties could not mediate. The court decided to make an appointment to settle the dispute by May 13, 2018. On February 13, 2018, the court scheduled the
January 19, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the parties could not mediate. The court decided to make an appointment to settle the dispute by May 13, 2018. On February 13, 2018, the court scheduled the
mediation to be on January 19, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the parties could not mediate. The court decided to make an appointment to settle the dispute by May 13, 2018. On February 13, 2018, the court
price appraised by the independent appraisal. 6) Expected Benefits of the Transaction The Company is in need of working capital for its business operation and liquidity supplement, including to resolve
the application of the standards and how to co-operate to resolve such issues. Enhancing Efficiency of SEC officers The SEC prioritizes the continuous competency development of its officers as seen in
not be approved from the shareholders meeting. Agenda 4 Others (if any) 6. Settle the name list of shareholders who have right to attend the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders No. 1/2020
court. Whereby the Subsidiary Company agreed to transfer the ownership of the mentioned Land and Buildings to settle disputes in this case. The court has ordered according to the aforementioned compromise
provision based on the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation by taking into account factors such as the amount of debt relieved by the rehabilitation plan, interest claims
on leadership responsibilities accordingly. 2. Ethical requirements When audit firms strictly follow ethical best practices and take actions to resolve any issues of non-compliance, it is to be
Buildings to settle disputes in this case. The court has ordered according to the aforementioned compromise agreement, as the red case no. Por. 682/2562. On 23 August 2019, Subsidiary Company has already