. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
IEC through the transactions related to the 10.70 million baht purchasing contract of waste trommel screen machines of the IEC project in Had Yai. The contract was made with Petchpiya Group Co, Ltd
committed a fraud by misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the 10.70 million baht purchasing contract of waste trommel screen machines of the IEC project in Had Yai. The contract
fraud by misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the 10.70 million baht purchasing contract of waste trommel screen machines of the IEC project in Had Yai. The contract was made
persons. Mr. Bhusana committed a fraud by misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the 10.70 million baht purchasing contract of waste trommel screen machines of the IEC project in
persons. Mr. Bhusana committed a fraud by misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the 10.70 million baht purchasing contract of waste trommel screen machines of the IEC project in
money of IEC through the transactions related to the 10.70 million baht purchasing contract of waste trommel screen machines of the IEC project in Had Yai. The contract was made with Petchpiya Group Co
(6) Mr. Tanyapisist Saprod and (7) Miss Metta Poking jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person which