) B.E. 2559 (2016), on three counts. The Civil Sanction Committee has resolved to instruct the SEC to impose civil sanction on the three offenders, as follows: (1) Warot was subject to pay a civil penalty

such sanction; however, they refused to pay the civil penalty. Consequently, the SEC forwarded the case for the public attorney to bring a further legal action in the Civil Court. In this regard, a

Section 317/5 of the SEA. Jakkaphong, as a person responsible for the operations of the legal entity, caused JKN to commit the aforementioned offense. He is therefore subject to the same penalty under

Sanction Committee (CSC) has therefore resolved to impose a civil sanction* on Mr. Pongsak Lothongkam, requiring him to pay a civil penalty, a compensation at an equal amount to the benefit received, and a

the SEA, subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1 and Section 296/2 of the SEA.  The Civil Sanction Committee (CSC) has therefore resolved to impose civil sanctions on the four

Committee has resolved to instruct SEC to impose civil sanction whereby Kitti and Kongpat must pay a separate civil penalty, compensate for the benefits received from committing the offenses, and reimburse

conjunction with Section 244(3) and subject to the penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the said Act.   The Civil Sanction Committee has resolved to instruct SEC to impose civil sanction on

with Section 86 of the Criminal Code.  The Civil Sanction Committee has resolved to instruct SEC to impose civil sanction whereby Chanyarat and Eakarat must pay a separate civil penalty and compensate

to perform duties responsibly with professional due care in violation of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board.* The SEC has therefore imposed the administrative sanction whereby her

impose civil sanction on the eight offenders. In this regard, (1) PCL, (2) Pranay, (3) Manish and (5) Amit were ordered to pay a separate civil penalty of 500,000 baht while (4) PAPL was ordered to pay