; asset systems that could not segregate the customers' assets from Satang's without doubt. DAB Act S.31 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 12/2022 Settlement Committee Order No. 20/2022 Dated 07
of Zipmex’s customers that were deposited to earn returns in Thailand in a way that Zipmex, without doubt, could not segregate digital assets of the customers and may use such digital assets for any
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. The company was dissolved. Therefore, the public prosecutor could not further the case. DV Act S.16 and Section 343 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Section
showed prices and trading volumes that is not actually occur during 2021 - 2022. Such information disclosure could mislead investors about the actual trading volumes or prices. This case is in the process
sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead the public and investors about
lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead
or details that could materially mislead the public and investors about STARK’s financial condition and business operation. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S
. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could
Zipmex’s customers that were deposited to earn returns in Thailand in a way that Zipmex, without doubt, could not segregate digital assets of the customers and may use such digital assets for any other