with the highest legal penalty. The SEC has sought the Court’s ruling (1) to impose a civil fine worth 1,000,000 baht on Mr. A, (2) to prohibit Mr. A from securities trading or entering into
highest legal penalty. The SEC has sought the Court’s ruling (1) to impose a civil fine worth 1,000,000 baht on {A}, (2) to prohibit {A} from securities trading or entering into derivatives contracts for
suspended. On March 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Thailand reversed the Appeal Court's ruling that Suree was a principal in jointly committing the offense with Chompoonuch in one count in accordance with
suspended. On March 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Thailand reversed the Appeal Court?s ruling that Suree was a principal in jointly committing the offense with Chompoonuch in one count in accordance with
Company Act.? In this regard, the SEC has taken into consideration the DBD?s ruling in conjunction with Section 89/7 of the SEA which prescribes duties of directors and executives of listed companies and
lawsuit against Surin in the Civil, pressing for civil sanctions with the highest legal penalty. SEC has sought the Court’s ruling to require Surin to pay a civil fine, compensate the benefits received
said: “This is a share price manipulation case proceeded under civil sanctions, filed with the Civil Court on 26 December 2018. The Appeal Court passed the final ruling on 15 December 2020. If the