sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead the public and investors about
lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead
been fully utilized. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information
. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could
(Baht 2,212 million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr
million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr. Choavalit as a
satisfied and the parties have fully complied with the conditions in the share purchase agreement. Aforementioned purchases were made prior to the dissemination of such inside information by Siam Commercial
to rise from 7.75 baht to 15.60 baht. The 13 offenders are (1) Mr. Kiatichai Monsereenusorn, (2) Mr. Nam Cholsaipan, (3) Mr. Suppawut Maneerin, (4) Miss Sani Jiewjinda, (5) Mr. Yos Thanarakchoke, (6