through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result of the company’s
through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
. The financial statement for the year 2016 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified financial
the SET and the SEC Office. The Form 56-1 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-1 was
Office.The Form 56-2 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS – IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-2 was filed with the SET and the SEC
relating companies with Beyond, the shareholders and executives of Beyond without due diligence and care in the same manner as a professional. Besides, Beyond gave the margin loan and performed in favor of
shares in his trading account in order to repayment of other persons' margin loan debt, prior to the disclosure of the inside information to the public on 7 June 2017 at 20.07 hrs. 19/08/2021 filed
baht. Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Jaruwan Bhusanabhibankup sold their SK1’s shares and received 300 million baht from the sale; the margin of approximately 45 million baht was given back to Mr. Bhusana
Miss Jaruwan Bhusanabhibankup sold their SK1’s shares and received 300 million baht from the sale; the margin of approximately 45 million baht was given back to Mr. Bhusana. This case is in the process