through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result of the company’s
's Q3/2019 performance would significantly improve because of receive a huge medical treatment income of chronic diseases from Social Security Office through his securities trading accounts during 10
about CHG's Q3/2019 performance would significantly improve because of receive a huge medical treatment income of chronic diseases from Social Security Office through her securities trading accounts
. The financial statement for the year 2016 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified financial
the SET and the SEC Office. The Form 56-1 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-1 was
Office.The Form 56-2 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS – IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-2 was filed with the SET and the SEC
which might affect to positive change in the price of CHG's share which was the fact that the CHG's Q3/2019 performance which would significantly improve because of receive a huge medical
pay there own costs and expenses.25/02/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement ordering the defendant to pay a sum of 333,333.33 Baht to the plaintiff to be collected as public revenue and