pay there own costs and expenses.25/02/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement ordering the defendant to pay a sum of 333,333.33 Baht to the plaintiff to be collected as public revenue and
from committing the offence since the date of the entry of the plaint until the defendant fully pays the said amount of money to the plaintiff to be collected as public revenue and ordering the
through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result of the company’s
through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
. The financial statement for the year 2016 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified financial
the SET and the SEC Office. The Form 56-1 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-1 was
Office.The Form 56-2 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS – IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-2 was filed with the SET and the SEC
account that Mr. Yanyong provided for them, in such a way as to take advantage of other persons by using material non-public information concerning increasing value of Pluto LNG Project from additional cost
account that Mr. Yanyong provided for them, in such a way as to take advantage of other persons by using material non-public information concerning increasing value of Pluto LNG Project from additional cost