owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the
outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the year 2015 without
the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial
the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial
believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual
auditor into believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the
through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result of the company’s
through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
. The financial statement for the year 2016 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified financial