. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
Property Perfect Public Company Limited Property Perfect Public Company Limited (?PF?), a securities issuer, had duty to prepare and submit the annual report for the year 2018 (Form 56-2) through
an SECC Holding’s director and executive with responsibility and due care by attending the Board of Directors’ meeting in which the fictitious loans worth Baht 245 million agenda was approved and
Mr. Sanith Adhyanasakul Mr. Sanith Adhyanasakul, Chief Executive Officer of Property Perfect Public Company Limited (?PF?) ,who is responsible for the operation of PF, had duty to supervise the
review responsibility of her audit group. She had the authorized access to view the draft financial statements in the EY information system and disclosed the inside information of the three companies to
(6) Mr. Tanyapisist Saprod and (7) Miss Metta Poking jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person which