manager that she had obtained such authorization and decided to trade by the instruction of clients? appointee or by her own deliberation. For a long period of time, she continually made trading decisions
securities trading account without any written authorization from the account owner. He admitted that both clients were siblings and the account owner asked her brother to submit trading orders without prior
), which is punishable under Section 274. In addition, the responsible management may be liable to punishment as prescribed by law. The SEC shall consider further legal action in due course
information to trade securities for his own and others? benefits in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the
dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the Act. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed a 2,820,000 baht fine on Ratanachai.
return any gains from the wrongdoings.* Mr. Thanawat came in to acknowledge the civil sanctions, but did not consent to comply with the punishment terms within the specified time. The SEC has
consultants were more knowledgeable or had better information than them. A number of clients were affected from trading and suffered losses. In many cases, the authorization led to trading more than the clients
Bangkok, February 25, 2015 ? The SEC suspended {A}, a capital market investment consultant of Kasikorn Securities Plc. for obtaining authorization to make derivatives and securities trading decisions
? behalf. With the said authorization, he traded with high trading volume for a period of time. {A} admitted to Maybank Kim Eng Securities that he used clients' User IDs and passwords to send trading orders