effective system for protecting the client?s asset that are (1) failing to segregate assets under its custody as assets of clients in accordance with the notification and (2) investing assets of clients in
Capital Market Supervisory Board by failing to put in place a sufficient and effective system for protecting the client’s asset that is investing assets of clients in private company bond which violated
Capital Market Supervisory Board by failing to put in place a sufficient and effective system for protecting the client’s asset that is investing assets of clients in private company bond which violated
of the Capital Market Supervisory Board by failing to put in place a sufficient and effective system for protecting the client’s asset that is investing assets of clients in private company bond which
notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board by failing to put in place a sufficient and effective system for protecting the client’s asset that is failing to segregate assets under its custody as assets
person as specified in the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board by failing to put in place a sufficient and effective system for protecting the client’s asset that are (1) failing to
an SECC Holding’s director and executive with responsibility and due care by attending the Board of Directors’ meeting in which the fictitious loans worth Baht 245 million agenda was approved and
agreement to purchase Kitha’s shares; the adding of special agenda to purchase Kitha’s shares in shareholder meeting and when the shareholder meeting approved, the agreement to purchase Kitha’s share became
agreement to purchase Kitha’s shares; the adding of special agenda to purchase Kitha’s shares in shareholder meeting and when the shareholder meeting approved, the agreement to purchase Kitha’s share became
shares and voting as proxy for shareholders in the agenda to purchase Kitha’s shares. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal