the investigative expenses, (4) ban the holding of director or executive position at any issuing company or securities company for twice the duration specified by the Civil Sanction Committee, and (5
relevant offense, (3) impose a reimbursement of the investigative expenses, (4) ban the holding of director or executive position at any issuing company or securities company for twice the duration
, (2) prohibit the offenders from trading securities on the SET or entering into derivatives contracts on the Derivatives Exchange, (3) ban the holding of director or executive position at any issuing
consultant for three months, which is counted as part of the five-year ban, SEC shall continue to ban her from re-entering the industry for another four years and nine months, starting from 15 January 2020
characteristics**. The SEC has set the period of the ban for one year, starting from 5 September 2018, during which Mr. Thanawat cannot serve as a director or executive of a securities company or a listed company
investment company, and to prevent legal evasion as well as to protect the interest of shareholders and investors. Essentially, the proposed amendments would: (1) Prohibit both Thai and foreign companies
regulation would prohibit digital asset business operators from: (1) Accepting deposits of digital assets from the customers and lending, investing, staking or employing such digital assets; (2) Accepting
with the highest legal penalty. The SEC has sought the Court’s ruling (1) to impose a civil fine worth 1,000,000 baht on Mr. A, (2) to prohibit Mr. A from securities trading or entering into
highest legal penalty. The SEC has sought the Court’s ruling (1) to impose a civil fine worth 1,000,000 baht on {A}, (2) to prohibit {A} from securities trading or entering into derivatives contracts for
proceeding, starting from 6 October 2016.In this case, the ban was not resulted from a criminal complaint initiated directly by the SEC, but from a criminal charge of the public prosecutor. The SEC had