Mr. Anan Keatkamjohnpattana Mr. Anan Keatkamjohnpattana aided and abetted Mr. Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms. Supaporn Lapvisutisin in committing offences. The action was considered as a

procedures as specified in the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board by failing to supervise transactions that are considered conflicts of interest by investing in two of IPO securities for

, conditions, and procedures as specified in the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board to supervise transactions that are considered conflicts of interest by investing in unrated and unlisted bill

and withdrawing customer's assets in Trade wallet and Z-wallet, which considered that such operation did not reach the standards as a professional required to perform, and failed to deliver

considered and validated KUB to be traded in the digital asset exchange by non-compliance with the Listing Rule approved by the SEC and disregard for the conflict of interest prevention measure. DAB Act S

, which considered that such operation did not reach the standards as a professional required to perform, and failed to deliver services in quality. DAB Act S.94 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 13/2022

but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed derivatives business. This case is under consideration of the public

Financial (NZ) Ltd. had been registered with the SEC as derivatives dealer but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed

considered that the transactions entailed the best interest for clients and failed to provide measures for preventing conflict of interests. SEC Act S.283 paragraph 1 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 2

granted as well as signing cheques which were handed to four borrowers. Her abovementioned failure was considered a contravention of Sections 89/7 and 89/24 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act B.E