admitted that he had been authorized by his clients to enter securities trading orders on the clients' behalf and then inform such client via mobile phone after the trades were executed. {A} also admitted
also admitted taking such trading orders via mobile phone. In addition, some of his clients' trading orders showed the concurrent price and time of the securities traded or canceled. Furthermore, the
they incompletely recorded client's securities or derivatives trading orders due to their receipt of such orders via mobile phone. The SEC therefore publicly diclosed their inappropriate behavior and
to consultation papers and more convenient participation in the hearing process. The website is accessible via multiple devices such as desktop, tablet and mobile phone, to fit the users
}, a securities investment consultant of the same company, did not record their clients? securities trading orders. The three persons admitted that they took large amount of orders via mobile phone in
million or 177% when compared with the same quarter of last year. This was resulting from an exclusive mobile phone project, a new project in the third quarter of 2018, recorded sales in this quarter of
the businesses in subsidiaries and associated the Company investing had improved operating results when compared to the same period last year. The business of mobile phone distribution business
contact him via mobile phone instead. Due to such behaviors, the employer suspended Nattavut for one month, starting from July 2 to 31, 2007. The SEC imposed the same sanction, taking effect simultaneously
} frequently failed to record his clients' securities trading orders as the same as {B} case as reported by his employer Phara Securities Plc. Both persons admitted that they took those orders via mobile phone
orders sent through him for several days. {A} admitted that the securities trading orders were taken via mobile phone; the misconduct of which he had previously committed. In case of {B}, the SEC found