buildings and the Machinery purchase agreement with Golden Arrow Coating Co., Ltd. of which Mr. Arkran Termritikulchai and Mr. Pasithphol Termritikulchai who are its Directors and are sons of Mr. Prachnon

obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence in relation to investment in Smart Traffic Co., Ltd., an associated company of EIC, impairment loss of investment and share of loss of such associated

unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect to valuation of investment in PT Sunhub Mining International (SMI), an associated company, and share of loss of investment in SMI

and Q1/2014 financial statements respectively due to limitation on their scope of audit/review. Accordingly, the auditors were unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect to

impairment of assets. In addition, the auditor was unable to use other means to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the matters. The SEC therefore instructed STHAI to rectify 2012 financial

office buildings and the Machinery purchase agreement with Golden Arrow Coating Co., Ltd. of which Mr. Arkran Termritikulchai and Mr. Pasithphol Termritikulchai who are its Directors and are sons of Mr

Machinery purchase agreement with Golden Arrow Coating Co., Ltd. of which Mr. Arkran Termritikulchai and Mr. Pasithphol Termritikulchai who are its Directors and are sons of Mr. Prachnon Termritikulchai

(paragraph ........); ( 2.1.2 incorrect use of accounting policy (paragraph........); ( 2.1.3 inappropriate/insufficient disclosure of information (paragraph........). ( 2.2 Inability to obtain sufficient

2.1.3 inappropriate/insufficient disclosure of information (paragraph........). ฆ 2.2 Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence and the possible effects are material, but not pervasive

the financial statements (paragraph number........) ( 2.2 The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, but the auditor concludes that the possible