granted as well as signing cheques which were handed to four borrowers. Her abovementioned failure was considered a contravention of Sections 89/7 and 89/24 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act B.E
, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid Mr.Bhusana with the money received from the share sale. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 89
Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid
receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Charuwan, who were his debtors. Later Miss
receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors
enter any material statement in the EARTH’s Board Resolution no. 5/2560 on 21 July 2017, which is a document of or related to EARTH, to deceive investors and debtors to misunderstand that EARTH has total
fail to enter any material statement in the EARTH’s Board Resolution no. 5/2560 on 21 July 2017, which is a document of or related to EARTH, to deceive investors and debtors to misunderstand that EARTH