rendered a judgement in the Red Case No. Por. 5396/2562, wherein the defendant was required to pay (1) a civil penalty, 1.25 times the benefits that the defendant received or would have received from
information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27
imposed a civil monetary penalty of 500,000 baht on the company. Prasit, who commanded or acted in such a way that resulted in the aforesaid violation by Mandawee Tour, contravened Section 300 in
, Amornrat and Walailuk, requiring each person to pay a separate civil monetary penalty, the benefits received from committing the offenses and reimburse SEC’s investigation expenses in total amount of
sanction proceedings against Apichart, Eng and Supanee requiring each offender to pay civil monetary penalty, disgorge the benefits of loss avoided from committing the offenses, and reimburse the SEC’s
Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee had resolved to impose a civil sanction on the three offenders who were subject to pay a separate civil penalty and compensate for the benefits that should have
Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee had resolved to impose a civil sanction on the three offenders who were subject to pay a separate civil penalty and compensate for the benefits that should
offences regarding market misconduct, and introducing civil penalty as an alternative sanction. Assistant Secretary-General Sakkarin Ruamrangsri said: ?The nature of market misconduct has become more
information and listed company executives? duty performance without due care, resulting in the total 31-million-baht civil penalty and the total 19.6-million-baht compensation for the equal amount of benefits
Earlier, the Civil Penalty Consideration Committee resolved to apply civil sanctions against Mr. A for obstructing and failing to set up a board of directors meeting and a shareholders meeting to