high gross profit margin from sale of goods at 42.7%, despite the decrease from 44.2% compared to the same period last year due to lower sales resulted from the store closure. The Company managed
) mutual fund; (10) private fund managed by a securities company for the investment of ultra-high net worth investors, high net worth investors or investors under (1) to (9) or (11) to (25); (11) provident
insurance company; (8) life insurance company; (9) mutual fund; (10) private fund managed by a securities company for the investment of ultra-high net worth investors, high net worth investors or investors
problem of purchasing power and incomes which have not yet recovered. Furthermore the liability stayed in high level and this was slightly speeded up the consumption. Therefore, it affected the expense
than existing products; and became more experienced with the production of high-end products, resulting in higher gross margin for Company. And the Company also better managed production costs from new
investor”, “ultra-high net worth investor” and “high net worth investor” shall have the same definitions as specified in the Notification of the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning Determination of
Redeeming Units of Foreign Collective Investment Scheme in case of Institutional or High Net Worth Investor dated 12 August 2012 shall be repealed. Clause 2 In this Notification: The terms “institutional
many areas and debt amount remained in high level. Confident index of consumer continuously decreased. Therefore, it affected the expense atmosphere to be sluggish. Cost of goods sold was 138.13 million
enforced by banks, brokers, etc. • Governance by code, not by people – Nobody to hold accountable – Code is not always well-written – Velocity of transactions is very high, e.g., “flash loans” • Reliance on