. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under

authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation

Mr. Saiphet Thongngao Mr. Saiphet Thongngao colluded with other alleged offenders in managing funds for others for profits from derivatives investment in the ordinary course of business. The

Miss Sureerat Ardpaksa Miss Sureerat Ardpaksa colluded with other alleged offenders in managing funds for others for profits from derivatives investment in the ordinary course of business. The

Mr. Woraphol Muenbowon Mr. Woraphol Muenbowon colluded with other alleged offenders in managing funds for others for profits from derivatives investment in the ordinary course of business. The

benefits and long-term return. Mr. Malpass received profits from providing investment advisory service in the ordinary course of business. Thus, Mr. Malpass operated securities business as investment advisor

Mr. Soraj Asavaprapha While being a director of Jasmine International Public Company Limited (JAS), Mr. Soraj Asavaprapha failed to perform his duties with loyalty as a result of obtaining unusual

(6) Mr. Tanyapisist Saprod and (7) Miss Metta Poking jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and

jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person which

jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person which