discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal
discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal
executives who have performed their duties with care and loyalty and more severe penalties may be imposed on directors or executives who commit a fraud. Q: In case where the board of directors hires an
law and standards. Guidelines 1.3.1 In assessing whether directors and executives have performed their fiduciary duties with the required responsibility, due care and loyalty, reference should
a failure to perform duties with responsibility, due care and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which causes damage to the company or creates benefits for oneself or others. In this regard
a failure to perform duties with responsibility, due care and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which causes damage to the company or creates benefits for oneself or others. In this regard
สุจริตต่อองค์กร (duty of loyalty) และดูแลให้การดำเนินงานเป็นไปตามกฎหมาย ข้อบังคับ และมติที่ประชุมผู้ถือหุ้น หลักปฏิบัติ 1.4 คณะกรรมการควรเข้าใจขอบเขตหน้าที่และความรับผิดชอบของคณะกรรมการ และกำหนดขอบเขตการ
discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal
discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal
without having to request for approval and submit filing. However, the company must comply with the following conditions: TSR is for a period of not more than two months. The duration of last exercise of