considered that auditor already performed duties in compliance with Section 89/25. However, in case auditor has discovered suspicious circumstance but the limitation on scope is imposed by client, as a result
considered that auditor already performed duties in compliance with Section 89/25. However, in case auditor has discovered suspicious circumstance but the limitation on scope is imposed by client, as a result
considered that auditor already performed duties in compliance with Section 89/25. However, in case auditor has discovered suspicious circumstance but the limitation on scope is imposed by client, as a result
considered that auditor already performed duties in compliance with Section 89/25. However, in case auditor has discovered suspicious circumstance but the limitation on scope is imposed by client, as a result
limitation period of the civil cases which may be requested for a Class Action in order to deal with the offence or liability under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and amended versions (“the
offence or liability under the Securities and Exchange Act The characteristics, examples and the limitation period of the civil cases which may be requested for a Class Action in order to deal with the
No limitation of holdings: (1) Tax-exempted institutional investors operating as a Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) such as the Government Pension Fund, Social Security Fund, Provident Funds, and
No limitation of holdings: (1) Tax-exempted institutional investors operating as a Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) such as the Government Pension Fund, Social Security Fund, Provident Funds, and
a failure to perform duties with responsibility, due care and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which causes damage to the company or creates benefits for oneself or others. In this regard
a failure to perform duties with responsibility, due care and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which causes damage to the company or creates benefits for oneself or others. In this regard